Thread:Rage gtx/@comment-26250681-20180406141154/@comment-24808887-20180406150542

Ok listen, I don't know why you don't get what I am telling you, but this time I will try explain it to as simple as possible(no offence). This is wikia, fan free editing, encyclopedia like(hence name wikia) any other fandom site with contents about certain thematics. When thematics is fictional universe(which is our case), and it's mantained well, only "reliable sources" for said fiction is fiction itself and all related authors in our case Ainana Hiro - and that's about it. No one ever will be using real examples as validation to adding anything into wikia based on fictional series, well they can but this wikia will be of very low grade. This is not matter of opinion this if well know standarts every good wikia about fictions operates by you can check it at any popular wikias be it Naruto, One Piece or any other Anime/LN-WN/Manga/Jrpg based wikias.

This is not about conflicting opinions of you and me regarding novel plot subject, it's about lack any basis on evaluating Emperor above King(within Novel Lore) and using non-existent(within Novel Lore) rank of Archduke, things like these added postfactum not prior it.

For example using same logic as yours with Archduke validation, some one can create page with character named "Joe" with same logical reason: - "Just because author did not mentioned or did not had time to describe Joe it does not mean he doesn't exist! Author using European name massive so there being Joe is given"

Same is with putting Emperor above King.

Other than that, I like your contributions to site and considering elevating you, Zetsuen and PSW0 to wiki stuff if you like, but this matter will remain as it is. Something like this must happen first to be added into wikia, well this is my fault anyway usually wikias have arcticle editing and creating and ect., policies for situations like this. Damn be my lack of time.